Greetings from Balaka! It has now been two weeks since I left California, and while I very much miss my bay area family, it has been really nice to reconnect with all of my friends here in Balaka.
Sorry for not updating this for such a long time, but things are very busy at work these days. I have been training my team of four interviewers, and making changes to the interview guide. While I’m here, I’m working mainly on a set of in-depth interviews, which is different from a survey in that we ask open-ended questions and the respondent does most of the talking. While surveys are great for many questions, in-depth interviewers allow respondents to tell stories and speak openly about their opinions. A really great interview is a joy to read, and a batch of several interviews can tell a researcher a lot about how people think and feel about an issue, in a deeper way than even the most well-designed survey.
The open-ended nature of in-depth interviews, however, also means that it is a challenge to train interviewers. The questionnaire that we have spent the past few weeks developing is by nature just a guide, and interviewers must feel comfortable straying from the questions printed on the page in order to follow up on stories that the respondent tells. Often respondents will answer questions before they are asked, and some questions will be inappropriate for certain respondents. It is a subtle art, and very much an expression of individual personalities and styles, so a trick that works for one person will come across as forced or fake for another. Add to that the fact that both the respondents and the interviewers have a totally different cultural background than me, and the fact that I have virtually no experience managing more than one person at a time, and you can imagine how much I have learned through this process of training the interviewers.
Luckily, I inherited an amazing team; one that already had some experience with this kind of work. They have already been working as in-depth interviewers for about 5 months. So while I had to teach them about the kinds of questions I’m interested in studying, they already knew something about how to conduct interviews. So I was reinforcing what they already knew rather than starting from scratch.
We spent several days “interviewing” each other as a way to practice and tinker with the questionnaire, which turned out to be a really great way to get to know each other, since the interviews are for the most part autobiographical. Ellie came in one day and they interviewed her, since she would be an “eligible” respondent if she were Malawian. She is within the age range I am targeting and is still in school. This interview led to a very interesting conversation about how the American education system works and how it is different in Malawi.
In particular, one of the things that I have been very struck by on this trip is the fact that the high school leaving exam is the exclusive pathway into college. This exam, called the MSCE, is being held this week. In the office where I work, a total of 6 people are taking the MSCE (the secondary school leaving exam) this week. All of them have been out of secondary school for at least 5 years, all are employed as interviewers or data assistants, have worked for TLT for at least a year, and thus have more knowledge about research than many college graduates. Yet they are spending their evenings studying high school text books, subjects that they passed successfully many years ago, in order to have a chance to go to university. This seems like a terrible waste of human capital to me, and the fact that nothing else makes any difference in determining whether a person is accepted into the university (job experience, other post-secondary degrees and diplomas, perormance in class).
If you don’t do well on the exam (even one subject can disqualify you from all university programs), or if you are just not within the lucky 10% of students with high scores who are selected to go to one of the public universities, your two options for going to college are to pay a lot more money and attend one of the private universities (which are typically of lower quality) or return to secondary school and try again. Even in the middle of one’s career, if you want to get a degree, it is necessary to go back to the last year of secondary school.